A study of the prevalence of parkinsons disease pd completed a door to door survey of an entire us county. Stakes 1974 analysis of nine program evaluation approaches provided a useful application of advance organizers the types of variables used to determine. Outline of principles of impact evalation discussion dra. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reporting of outcome definitions, selection, measurement and analysis in existing cohort. Outcome bias is a cognitive bias which refers to the tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of judging it based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made. Outcome bias and the psychology that prevents sustained success. Howard marks, inspiration from the world of sports memo. Outcome the likely or achieved shortterm and mediumterm effects of an.
Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems. Outcome bias and the psychology that prevents sustained. For example, in one scenario, a real estate agent fails to disclose to the customers the high probability of the basement of the house flooding. Thus, we could verify the hypothesis that we are readily got trapped in the outcome bias. The seller intentionally omits it from the houses legally required disclosure document, and fails to reveal it in the negotiation. Infection and population health ucl, royal free campus london, uk. Bias bias occurs when there is a systematic difference between the results from a study and the true state. Hindsight wisdom outcome knowledge and the evaluation of. Unconscious bias is the enemy of innovation, driving us toward the easiest and quickest solutions at the expense of more creative, bright ideas. Outcome bias in decision making on punishment or reward. We document outcome bias in situations where an agent makes risky financial.
In psychology, there is a phenomenon called outcome bias, which basically means that we tend to judge the efficacy of a decision based primarily on how things turn out. The proper analysis of impact requires a counterfactual of what those outcomes would have been in the absence of the intervention. Positiveoutcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of. By categorizing individuals in terms of four dichotomiesthinking and feeling, extroversion and introversion, judging and perception, and sensing and intuitionthe mbti provides a map of the individuals orientation toward decision making. The fact that something worked doesnt mean it was the result of a correct decision, and the fact that something failed doesnt mean the decision was wrong. Define and give examples of formative and summative evaluation. Pdf outcome bias in decision making on punishment or reward. Program evaluation has long been a important part of economics, from the negative income tax experiments to the wave of recent randomized control trials rcts in development, health, and other elds. Explain the role of program evaluation and the facts that support it. Unconscious bias training equality and human rights. Neurodevelopmental outcome descriptions in cohorts of. Second, our work addresses a possible confound present in many previous studies of the outcome bias. Hershey department of decision sciences university of pennsylvania in 5 studies, undergraduate subjects were given descriptions and outcomes of decisions made by others under conditions of uncertainty. In 5 studies, undergraduate subjects were given descriptions and outcomes of decisions made by others under conditions of uncertainty.
Selection bias can arise in studies because groups of participants may differ in ways other than the interventions or exposures under investigation. Outcome bias does not involve analysis of factors that lead to a. In analyzing the twentytwo evaluation approaches, prior assessments regarding program evaluations state of the art were considered. We document outcome bias in situations where an agent makes risky financial decisions for a principal. Biases in how we think can be major obstacles in any decisionmaking process. Researchers noted even when individuals understand they show this bias, it continues to persist. Outcome knowledge can also bias our thinking on the quality of the processes that led to the outcome. Evaluation brief 3 of a fourpart series on the evaluation of training and technical assistance services. Outcome bias in decision evaluation pdf download 17fy12. Key findings overall, our evaluation of rigorous studies on the effectiveness of ubt indicates a mixed picture and a need for further research to determine the effectiveness of unconscious bias training. Outcome bias in decision evaluation article pdf available in journal of personality and social psychology 544. For example, for certain types of questions, answers that people rate as 99% certain turn out to be wrong 40% of the time.
Outcome bias in clinical decision making and the assessment. Sep, 2017 unconscious bias is the enemy of innovation, driving us toward the easiest and quickest solutions at the expense of more creative, bright ideas. Quantitative and qualitative methods in impact evaluation. Authors should prepare manuscripts according to the publication manual of the american psy. In recent years, organizations in the human services field have increasingly considered not only what programs and practices to implement but also how to implement them and whether. Looking back at the thesis, i do believe it was logical and wellthoughtout. Outline of principles of impact evaluation part i key concepts definition impact evaluation is an assessment of how the intervention being evaluated affects outcomes, whether these effects are intended or unintended. Bias in program evaluation learning theories and all things.
When this is the case, the results of the study are biased by confounding. According to this model, decision makers systematically evaluate the. Decisions concerned either medical matters or monetary. The completeness of outcome reporting in this area is unknown. Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning. Outcome bias arises when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events, without regard to how the past events developed. Types of evaluation centers for disease control and. Here we investigated the foreign language effect on the outcome bias in a new scenario. Formative evaluation ensures that a program or program activity is feasible, appropriate, and acceptable before it.
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people with outcome knowledge to exaggerate the extent to which they would have predicted the event beforehand, while outcome bias refers to the influence of outcome knowledge on evaluations of decision quality. There are several types of evaluations that can be conducted. In other words, outcome evaluations aim to assess treatment effectiveness. Pdf we paid attention to one of the cognitive biases, that is, the outcome bias. It occurs when the outcome of an experiment or research study influences the decision whether to publish or otherwise distribute it. Publication bias is a type of bias that occurs in published academic research. Pdf outcome bias in decision evaluation researchgate. Outcome bias is the tendency to evaluate a decision on the basis of its outcome rather than on what factors led to the decision. Wave 4 was designed to evaluate the mechanism behind outcome bias in our. Comparing process and outcome evaluations national council. Because process evaluation allows a nonprofit to look at how it develops itself, its structures, its supporting programs like communications and marketing, and even fund development to get to the. This was done to increase the scope in which we explored the outcome bias. Some implications were given for safety management that put more emphasis on the process than on the outcome.
Player 1 can free to select one of the three types of dice. Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents christian konigkersting 1, monique pollmann2, jan potters2, and stefan t. Evaluating the outcomes of our actions makes sense. Often, when looking back at past investment decisions, we allow ourselves to make the mistake of outcome biasness. For example, a doctor decides to give a critically ill child a new, experimental medication that has a 50% chance of curing the childs condition. The limits of the foreign language effect on decision.
Two common ways to assess a program are process evaluation and outcome evaluation. Pdf in 5 studies, undergraduate subjects were given descriptions and outcomes of decisions made by others under conditions of uncertainty. Both monitoring and evaluation are meant to influence decisionmaking, including decisions to. For many decision tasks, basic and intermediate cognitive skills such as working memory and speed of processing often are the strongest predictor of decision outcome. Interestingly even when individuals stated that the outcome should not have factored into the quality of the decision, they still showed a bias toward the decisions with positive outcomes. Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk. In this paper, we explore the extent of outcome bias in strategic interactions. Simply put, outcome bias in medicine occurs when the assessment of the quality of a clinical decision, such as the ordering of a particular test or treatment, is affected by knowledge.
Outcome bias in decision evaluation jonathan baron university of pennsylvania john c. Evaluation is an important part of managing a successful program. Often, evaluations from one or more sample sites are generalized to make a policy decision for a larger set of target sites. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computerbased clinical decision support system. To avoid the influence of outcome bias, one should evaluate a decision by ignoring information collected after the fact and focusing on what the right answer is, or was at the time the decision was made. Outcome bias is a fundamental misattribution that blames a knowably random event on the actions of an involved party. Whereas evaluators are required to report outcomes in full, policymakers have a vested interest in framing these outcomes in a positive lightespecially when they previously expressed a commitment to the reform. Refinement of outcome bias measurement in the parental decision. The outcome bias in ethical judgments a home seller neglects to inform the buyer about the homes occasional problems with flooding in the basement. Outcome evaluations measure how clients and their circumstances change, and whether the treatment experience has been a factor in causing this change. Feb 26, 2012 this entry was posted on february 26, 2012, in program evaluation and tagged bias, fitzpatrick, general semantics, pearson education, program evaluation, sanders, worthen. Outcome bias not all outcomes are created equal interaction. Unconscious bias training equality and human rights commission. The outcome bias is an error made in evaluating the quality of a decision when the outcome of.
Stakeholdersincluding program directors, community members, and funderswant to know if a particular program is working as expected and making a difference for its intended participants. The quality of the process that led to the investment decision was definitely not one that was rushed or haphazardly done. Positive outcome also known as publication bias refers to the fact that research with positive outcomes is much more likely to be published than that with negative outcomes. Outcome bias is a cognitive bias which refers to the tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of judging it based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made for example, in one scenario, a real estate agent fails to disclose to the customers the. Overemphasizing outcome evaluation at the cost of other types, especially process evaluation, is a disservice to nonprofits and the sector. This is where we use the outcome to determine the validity of our decisions. In the standard decision making task, materials are. When the more risky option is not taken, they differ in whether the foregone outcome was greater 3, 8, 12, and 16 or less 4, 7, 11, 15 than the outcome obtained. These cases can be used to look for a foregone outcome bias on the evaluation of decisions.
This paper examines the influence of outcome knowledge in relation to reconstructive memory and legal testimony, ways for reducing the impact of outcome knowledge, and an adaptive learning framework that places hindsight bias in a broader. What we miss when we judge a decision by the outcome. The consequences of this are not always severe or the bias would not exist but they can be. This study examined the effects of outcome quality success vs. The tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made. Hershey department of decision sciences university of pennsylvania in s studies. The purpose of this document is to advance the foundations existing work so that our evaluation practices become more consistent across the organization. Knowledge of the outcome has enabled mediocre processes to be evaluated as good, and sound. Effect of intention on outcome bias in decision making. Excessive confidence in ones own answers to questions.
Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning bmj. Monitoring and evaluation in unicef assisted programmes provide the basis for broader. Outside of psychological experiments, the outcome bias has been found to be substantially present in real world situations. Bias bias occurs when there is a systematic difference between the results from a study and the true state of affairs bias is often introduced when a study is being designed, but can be introduced at any stage appropriate statistical methods can reduce the effect of bias, but may not eliminate it totally. Background and objectives caregivers and clinicians of extremely preterm infants born before 26 weeks gestation depend on longterm followup research to inform clinical decisionmaking. The hindsight bias might be included in the outcome bias, and distort our evaluation of decision punishment reward, together with the outcome bias, to the irrational evaluation that ignores the intention and pay emphasis on only the outcome. Colorado probation research in brief outcome bias in. Publishing only results that show a significant finding disturbs the balance of findings, and inserts bias in favor of positive results. Various heuristics and biases have been identified and described in research literature. Moreover, the outcome bias was not observed when the outcome was fair. The reporting of evaluation outcomes can be a point of contention between evaluators and policymakers when a given reform fails to fulfil its promises. The impact of unconscious bias on leadership decision making. Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records.
Outcome bias is a problem because it leads us to repeat poor decision making based on outcomes rather than on the process used to obtain the outcome. Decisions concerned either medical matters or monetary gambles. Processtracing techniques may allow a more thorough examination of task performance and strategic processing 3, 4, 14, 15. The limits of the foreign language effect on decisionmaking. This first section defines qualitative methods, distinguishes them from quantitative research methods, and outlines the roles qualitative approaches can play in program evaluation. Jul 19, 2019 outcome bias arises when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events, without regard to how the past events developed. This time, the scenario was related to the financial domain, not the health one. Evaluation is the systematic process of delineating, obtaining, reporting, and applying descriptive and. However, i would admit that such an investment decision was one where we deviated from all our norms and broke all our.
What is bias and how can it affect the outcomes from research. Heinzen and others published ethical evaluation bias find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. Qualitative research methods in program evaluation. And evaluation is practiced with increasing frequency, intensity, and skill across all programs and several administrative departments in the foundation. Baron and hershey 1 explored outcome bias in evaluation of decision making on either medical. This is at least as true in investing as it is in sports.
1053 217 1345 1361 1392 1474 175 989 42 483 1270 651 917 614 1499 994 1192 560 72 946 1335 937 1046 704 564 1415 775 775 417 178 55 94 822 202